On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 23:20, Aaron Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 22:49, Jeff Pickhardt <pickha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> For implementation, I was thinking of either >>> >>> 1) forking the CoffeeScript parser and adapting it to Python >>> (http://jashkenas.github.com/coffee-script/documentation/docs/grammar.html) >>> >>> 2) using something more Python-specific, if one already exists >> >> http://www.dalkescientific.com/Python/python4ply.html > > Cool. What's the advantage of using that over just using what's in > the standard library?
Actually being able to modify the grammar to parse a not-quite-Python language. The parser in the standard library only parses Python and nothing else. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
