On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Joachim Durchholz <j...@durchholz.org> wrote: > Am 17.03.2012 13:03, schrieb Sergiu Ivanov: > >> In this case we might collect the statistics to >> >> see which of the grammars is usually chosen in ambiguous situations so >> that we will be able to alter the defaults correspondingly. > > > How about letting the user specify the syntax, the default option being > "auto-detect"?
Yeah, this sounds cool. What I like best about this approach is that things are expected to work nicely (or fail gracefully) both when the user specifies the syntax and when they don't. In this case we may even disregard the idea of collecting information as to which grammars are usually preferred. > I'm a bit sceptical about trying to get correlations out of user input. > Repeating myself: User input is multi-channel high-noise input, extracting > useful signals from that is hard. Does your scepticism mean that you don't expect much useful information without considerable effort or that you don't expect anything useful of collecting the data at all? Sergiu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
