I think it would be best if sympify() were to remain a strict Python
to SymPy parser.  In this respect, there are very few things that it
cannot do yet (the two that I can think of are
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2663 and
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3051).

Aaron Meurer

On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Sergiu Ivanov
<unlimitedscol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 1:23 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
> <krastanov.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The idea behind sympify is not to be a parser for everything that a
>> user can enter. Work done on gamma.sympy is more related to the other
>> parsers that can be found in sympy.
>
> Yes, sure, I understand that the scope of sympify() is more specific.
> However, the format of expressions accepted by sympify() should also
> be accepted by Gamma, which makes enhancing sympify() strongly related
> to enhancing Gamma (at least in the aspect of handling inputs in a
> syntax similar to Python).
>
> Sergiu
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to