This is great.  I'll try to help review the non-trivial stuff, as much
as I can.  How long are you on holiday?

Aaron Meurer

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Tom Bachmann <e_mc...@web.de> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm currently on holidays and have started or writing a commutative algebra
> / algebraic geometry module, something I have been wanting to do for quite a
> long time. This will be quite a body of code, and I'm afraid I don't know
> the proper etiquette in getting so much code into sympy, outside the "gsoc
> cycle". I have been doing my best to break up everything into manageble
> chunks, and to make pull requests at the smallest possible size that seemed
> sensible to me - this turns out to typically be about 800 LOC changed. There
> are currently three pull requests wating:
>
> - [1] implements low-level groebner basis code
> - [2] extends the polys DMP and DMF types, and implements a domain
>      for generalized polynomial rings
> - [3] starts the commutative algebra module proper: it implements
>      finitely generated free modules over generalized polynomial rings
>      and their submodules.
>
> There is also a tiny pull request [0] which may seem somewhat random, but I
> believe it will come in handy when free resolutions are implemented.
>
> I would be glad for any reviews. I believe there should be "something for
> everybody": do you consider yourself an expert in groebner bases - take a
> look at [1]. Are you worried about where the polys module is going - take
> [2]. Do you want to critizise a new class structure - go to [3]. Fancy to
> spare only a few minutes - look at [0].
>
> I may be sounding a little pushy here, but the problem is that I am just
> barely getting towards mathematics that I find interesting (homological
> algebra), with what I actually want to do (algebraic geometry) still far in
> the future. I have some amount of time over the next month or so and I feel
> like I want to write a lot of code, but this is difficult if I cannot get it
> pushed. I understand that this is a strain on everyone doing the reviewing,
> and I'm obviously glad to "tit-for-tat" ("I review yours, you review mine").
> In fact I have been trying to increase my reviewing work so as to encourage
> others to look at my code ;). (I am aware of one large pull request [4], but
> each time I try I see that this mostly changes parts of the core I am not
> really comfortable with.)
>
> To give an idea of how much more there is to come, unless someone decisively
> tells me to stop or convincingly argues that it is not going to be merged
> (approx. one pull request per bullet point)
>
> - ideals, quotient rings, free modules over quotient rings
> - module homomorphisms, kernels, images
> - quotient modules
> - ideal operations: quotient, saturation, intersection
> - chain complexes, free resolutions
> - tensor and hom modules, Tor and Ext functors
>
> Probably more than one PR each:
> - radical of an ideal
> - primary decomposition
>
> This is what I see as the basics of commutative algebra. We are talking
> about "naive" algorithms here (that is, obvious groebner basis computations,
> no particular optimizations). After that I would start on algebraic
> geometry.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
> [0] https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1192
> [1] https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1190
> [2] https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1199
> [3] https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1209
> [4] https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1162
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to