I thought this too, but the consensus was to make it not do it. For example, what would (x + y).subs(Eq(x, y)) return? See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2677.
Aaron Meurer On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:36 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com <krastanov.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do you agree? It would be useful for: > > In [10]: x.subs(Eq(x,1)) > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ValueError: > When a single argument is passed to subs it should be an iterable of > (old, new) tuples. > > In [11]: x.subs([Eq(x,1)]) > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > TypeError: 'Equality' object is not iterable > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
