> I think it works well. Would you mind posting your current script? > So that I can set it up on my server as well. OK, however it will not do much good - what is tested by your server will not be tested by mine and vice-versa. So running it on two machines would be useful only if there are too many pull requests to be tested.
https://gist.github.com/2985162 > I think that your sympy-bot installation is using > randomized hashes, right? It's important to have one such set of tests > to discover the hash() bugs. It is using randomized hashes because the test runner uses them by default (since yesterday, thanks to a pull request done by Aaron). In detail: - python2.5, 32bit, without additional installed modules, without hash randomization because it is not supported in 2.5 - python2.7.3, 64bit, with numpy, gmpy, matplotlib, with hash randomization - python3.2.3, 64bit, without additional installed modules, with hash randomization So we have both tests with and without hash randomization at the moment on both architectures. Off topic: Just because of how silly it would be I would also start testing on a RasberyPie ARM processor when I receive it in a month or two. > I just donated $70 to Travis CI for sympy, so they will probably > enable the pull request testing > soon. This is great. Is there actually a way to donate to sympy in order to pay for stuff like this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
