On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 7:52:34 PM UTC+5:30, Stefan Krastanov wrote: > > > For the mutability issue : Just as Aaron suggested, we do really need > the > > objects to be mutable. Doing something as > > If I understand correctly, Aaron's main point was that mutability is > useful only in certain cases and I do not think that the current > module requires it. Most of the arguments in favor of mutability were > about how to relate two reference frames (both static translation and > orientation as well as relative velocity and angular velocity). I > think that the example I provided addresses these issue and mutability > is not necessary. >
Oh! I'm really sorry :P I meant > ... we do *not* really need the objects to be mutable. Doing something as .... Little typo, big confusion :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en-US. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
