On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Aditya Shah <adityasha...@gmail.com> wrote: > @Certik Thanks for replying. I think that we might be able to make quite a > robust parser after all. Well I do agree that it may escape some very > peculiar use cases but still according to me such a parser (and quite fully > functional at that) is better than having no parser. > > I am currently pursuing a project in NLP for my coursework and I do have a > decent experience in the area. So will that be considered as a new proposal > or a continuation of this proposal itself?
I would suggest you write up your ideas into one proposal on our wiki and then invite people here to comment on it, and you can always split it into two proposals if you want. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CADDwiVCQws-UojVUS92fMQ9hqK%2BHt92C_chQgj1L8h_JdYqNqQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
