Am 24.02.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Nathan Woods:
Anyway, I would like to package this up in a way that would be publicly useful, but I'm not sure where it fits. Sympy seemed a likely guess, but the SciPy dependence is problematic.
Out of the box, a separate project with a dependency on both SymPy and SciPy would probably fit best.
> Alternatively, the
discontinuity-processing could be decoupled and used with any iterated integrator that supports manually specified points of discontinuity.
Decoupling and putting the modules into their respective projects would work, too.
It's much more work though. > If
Sympy isn't a good fit for this, I would appreciate suggestions about other places that might be better.
I did not fully understand your description of what your code does, so I can't be very specific. In general, anything that analyzes mathematical objects for properties of interest that go beyond a one-shot task would be a worthy addition to SymPy.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/54ECA421.9040902%40durchholz.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
