What would case Eq.simplify() to return False? There isn't a lot of computation time before the result.
Also why would using together() before substituting an expression lead to a numerically different result? I have a series of equations that I've been substituting in to each other building up a final symbolic result. My first pass at this gave a result that looks reasonable (though I haven't proven it correct) when I convert it to a numpy function after using Eq.subs(dictionary of values for symbols).simplify().n() and plot it. When I took the last symbolic equation to be substituted and use Eq.together() on it before substituting to get a simpler result, the Eq.subs().simplify() returns False. When I manipulate it differently to get it to successfully lambdify, the resulting plot is different (and appears wrong). Thanks-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/1c324cfc-6bb3-4951-8cd7-22394a8c4bcd%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
