There's no precedence for it as far as I know. The operator was only designed for matrix multiplication (which, by the way, we ought to implement it for Matrix).
There is a technical challenge in that functions in SymPy are typically classes, meaning the operator would have to be defined on the metaclass. We've been trying to get rid of our metaclasses because they can slow things down and they make the code more confusing. I believe it is doable, though. Aaron Meurer On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Christophe Bal <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello. > > The new operator @ could be usez to define composition of two functions : > g@f(x) = g(f(x)). > > Bad or good idea ? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAAb4jGknd6%3DbxKZuUGsTp4d6Howwe5dOzAX4p6p%3DBTX488D4CQ%40mail.gmail.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAKgW%3D6%2BX0HgTo8LQMFM200-sJvp60koRm64Re2_SXY03S9zCpg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
