Hi Jason, I agree with you on that. I was thinking it would be good to have SymPy as a standalone library, by which I mean it would be good if users can find other utilities too.
It would be kind of hard and messier (from personal experience) if someone wanted to use the power of symbolic computation for signal processing purposes but had to take the help of SciPy along the way to do the signal processing part (basically the person would have to convert from symbolic to numerical by taking samples and then again numeric to symbolic in some way). So I thought it would be a good addition. If you think it's unnecessary but there are certain signal processing aspects that SymPy could use please feel free to suggest it. I'll see if it is within my skills to work on it. Thanks in Advance! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/9b36916b-15e2-4da1-8649-afa628e22a7b%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.