I think maybe there were some checks that were done by flake8 that weren't yet implemented by ruff. I don't know if that's still the case. I agree we could probably just use ruff if it is doing everything flake8 does.
Aaron Meurer On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 6:50 AM Shishir Kushwaha <kushwahashishir1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was going through the pyproject.toml file and learned that we are using > ruff which is also a test or part of a test that runs on github CLI . In the > documentation as well as github CLI we are using ruff which can be used to > replace flake8 from what I have read . > In that case why do we use both of them when the work could just be done with > ruff . > > _____ > Shishir Kushwaha > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/33ecc4b9-d500-4233-ad3b-2ff5df3e56dbn%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAKgW%3D6%2BiOuTGxM9HPJxgQc8-D4bqnbt1iMkO6F%3DqCUofpB0kCw%40mail.gmail.com.
