Dear Sangyub, of course chatGPT, or AI in general is a GREAT thing, and surely will improve at rapid pace. For the example I cited I used the free version of chatGPT, maybe it is dumber than the paid for one, which I do not have.
I feel the PRs for sympy (and likely for other packages, too) serve a dual purpose: 1. make sympy even better 2. When the reviewers discuss with submitters, the (mostly young) submitters learn something. Point 1.could be taken over by AI sometime, but them Point 2. would be dead,. At least in my view point 2 is a VERY important one, and should not be given up lightly. Peter Oscar schrieb am Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2026 um 00:42:57 UTC+1: > On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 at 23:27, Sangyub Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > ChatGPT is anyway undoubtedly one of the greatest achievement of > computer science, > > like how landing in Mars is going to be greatest achievement of natural > science, > > and now if we are being bottleneck for ChatGPT, it means we are the > problem. > > What solution do you propose to that problem? > > Just forget about SymPy and move on because the AI will make a better > version? > > ChatGPT even uses SymPy both for training and during inference as I > understand it. > > -- > Oscar > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/39929455-45f7-4aa1-9144-9b95dc835ec3n%40googlegroups.com.
