> Someone has posted the following on the kbmMW forums regarding the > speed of Synapse TCP/IP comms in comparison to Indy. I'm surprised at the > difference in speed so I though I'd ask your opinion. > > Is this typical?
Synapse itself is fast. For example, I have my own middleware based on Synapse used in our big library system. client communicating by HttpSend with application server where is HTTP server with middleware builded by Synapse too. This middleware communication with firebird database server on third computer. Typical response time on clinet (client->applicationserver- >databaseserver->applicationserver->client) is less then 10ms! Measured response times cca 800ms on kbmMW is terrible and it can be caused by badly written Synapse support. For example, each send-send- receive scenario causing 200ms delay due 'delayed ACK' issue. BTW: HttpSend from Synasnap have fixed this issue and is much faster then httpsend in lates release! I not know who written Synapse support for kbmMW and I not know how good it is written. I not know if they are using their own transport protocol or if they are using httpsend or another transport. First, try test on latest synasnap. If it not help, then Synapse support in kbmMW is badly written and need to rewrite. -- Lukas Gebauer. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB: http://www.ararat.cz/synapse - Synapse Delphi and Kylix TCP/IP Library ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ synalist-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
