theo wrote: >You can do that, but I'm not sure if performance is getting any better >(rather the opposite).
I thought it had something to do with the performance. If I wanted to get that many threads (up to 50) any other means of doing that without degrading the performance? I read about Thread pooling for servers, maybe a way to do that for a client? Anyway thank you for answering my original question, and have to get into the code and try it out. _________________________________________________________________ Get today's hot entertainment gossip http://movies.msn.com/movies/hotgossip ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ synalist-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
