> Did you have similar parts structure? > > 1 multipart/mixed > 1.1 multipart/alternative > 1.1.1 text/plain > 1.1.2 text/html > 1.2 text/html (or other attachment...)
Amost, try also to delete all "Content-Disposition: inline", that possibly confuse specific version of Outlook. Lukas, you force 'inline' on each (as called by RFC) bodypart (text or html content). However, from RFC 2183: "2.1 The Inline Disposition Type A bodypart should be marked `inline' if it is intended to be displayed automatically upon display of the message. Inline bodyparts should be presented in the order in which they occur, subject to the normal semantics of multipart messages." Thus is possible collision with 2.9 as well with specific Outlook. Sasa -- www.szutils.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ synalist-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
