thank you for your critics but allow me to disagree with u

1st msg was about a "bug" related to the attachments naming. another person
here even suggested a fix for that and got my vote here. i admit i dont know
if geby used this or not

2nd msg was about a network issue that another person reported he encountered
it as well and it was discussed here eventually

3rd msg i dont really remember what it was at the moment.

anyway, i consider my email (to which u just replied) as non relevant anymore

--
On 02/05/2008 16:44:50, Roberto - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>2008/4/20 amos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> hi
>>
>>  i have sent 3 msgs already to this newsgroup and it seems that all of them
were
>>  ignored while others got replies.
>>
>>  am i being ignored on purpose? is there something i have done?
>>
>>  i hope that at least this msg will be get an answer
>>  thanks

>Your questions/problems are sometimes too 'involved', sort of like
>asking us to debug your code by email. You will have to start solving
>difficult problems on your own. It isn't personal, we have other fish
>to fry.

>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
>Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save
>$100. Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?
http://java.sun.com/javaone
>_______________________________________________
>synalist-public mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
synalist-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public

Reply via email to