[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti: > with all do respect, synapse should work according to the rules and not > handle according to certain servers problems, specially if it is "against > the rules". it is written there very clearly that the blame is on the > servers.
If I read RFC822's syntax portion correctly, the "reply-to"-header should contain "address" (whereas many other similar fields like "from" and "sender" are supposed to contain "mailbox"). Of course, the latter part of the RFC specifies that according to syntax, "address" can be a "mailbox", which - on the other hand - is either "addr spec" (the address) *or* "phrase route-addr" (the whole mishmash containing name etc.) Ok... RFC822 is obsoleted by RFC2822, but as far as I can tell, not much has changed on this (except that the "phrase route-addr" is now something called "name-addr", but the syntax hasn't notably changed), many things are now more strict than before. Oh, you might be wondering why I wrote this message... no particular reason, just spending time at the office after everyone else has gone away :) -- Markku Uttula ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ synalist-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
