On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 21:22 +0000, Paul Fremantle wrote: > Ant > > I need to think about this more. I had been thinking TCP/IP default > network routing (i.e. the network decides the path) rather than Loose > Source Routing (message decides path). On the whole network-decides is > simpler, less flexible and more stable, message decides is more > complex, dangerous and powerful. MS had something like this > (WS-Routing) but it was killed for security reasons. > > If we take this model, I would suggest an approach where we default to > network-decides and then have a way for message to override if > necessary. That could be an extension of the current model.
Big +1. Let's start simple and then worry about adding all the fancy bells and whistles. > I still would like to get some agreement on the approach we have in > code and then move from there. I think it has got to the point of > non-productive not even to have a HEAD. I agree wholeheartedly. We're spinning around in design playland right now and that's not at all productive. Let's get the show on the road with a basic starting point. Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
