On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 08:45 +0530, Asankha C. Perera wrote: > Sanjiva > > One reason I thought of keeping things separate is that most of the > time users may want to have an endpoint named "mywebservice" and maybe > also a sequence with the same name "mywebservice" just since it seems > easier in a usability point of view, so that it implicitly ties > different items together. If we kept everything together, we will need > to use unique names for the above scenario, as well as cast back > objects by first checking which type of objects they are when you do a > getProperty() etc.
I wasn't suggesting that we put endpoints, sequences etc. into this property bag. Rather, if any mediator wants to save some state / context / whatever, then they can put it into the property bag and save it. We just document saying the names are flat so use your creativity to make good names! Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
