Asankha, wiki is good for discussion. I'd prefer a xml version that can reflect the work on the trunk.
thanks, dims On 7/17/06, Asankha C. Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dims Right now the latest Synapse Configuration Language docs are on the wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Synapse/InProgress/SynapseConfigurationLanguage) as we are not changing the docs for M2..and currently some changes are taking place. Shall I place the Wiki src for the above page under Xdocs instead of its XML/Html? thanks asankha Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Asankha, > > Could you please check in a version (html or xml) to svn under xdocs? > So that we can track the changes. I'd like to help rewrite some of the > sentences to better describe what the functionalities are. Let's nail > it down then see if we want to do the xsd thing or not. > > thanks, > dims > > On 7/15/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> We'll have to ask Asankha what he had in mind .. in my mind it was >> always that @source was used to select what to apply the filter to and >> xpath or regex were ways of filtering. >> >> Sanjiva. >> >> On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 21:19 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Forget about XSD and validation....Am just trying to decipher the >> > intent from the verbiage / examples on the wiki page...Please bear >> > with me. I think i am getting the point. But just for clarification. >> > >> > #1: The example on the page says: >> > <filter xpath="//*[wsx:symbol='MSFT']" >> xmlns:wsx="http://www.webserviceX.NET/";> >> > >> > So you are saying that it is implicitly >> > >> > <filter source="/soap:Envelope" xpath="//*[wsx:symbol='MSFT']" >> > xmlns:wsx="http://www.webserviceX.NET/";> >> > >> > Because you need to run the xpath on something and that something is >> > the soap envelope. Right? >> > >> > #2: If #1 is true, then the syntax on the wiki has an implicit source, >> > but one cannot specify a source explicitly when xpath is specified. >> > Right? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > dims >> > >> > On 7/14/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 13:00 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> > > > Let me try another variation to see if folks like it: >> > > > >> > > > Syntax: >> > > > <filter source="xpath" [regex="string"]> >> > > > mediator+ >> > > > </filter> >> > > > >> > > > Explanation: >> > > > If the regular expression is present then the <filter> mediator >> > > > matches the evaluation result of a source xpath expression >> against the >> > > > given regular expression. If the regex is absent, then the >> mediator >> > > > tests the given source xpath expression as a boolean >> expression. In >> > > > either case, If the test succeeds, the filter mediator will >> execute >> > > > the enclosed mediators in sequence. >> > > >> > > This is not what @source means .. it identifies the data to >> filter; the >> > > "source" for filtration. If @source is missing, the data is >> > > the /soap:Envelope element. If its there it can point to any >> place in >> > > the message and then the regex or xpath matches against that node. >> > > >> > > So your proposal has lost function. >> > > >> > > Again, I'm -1 to the *principle*: If the language syntax is bust >> let's >> > > fix it. But let's *not* convolute the syntax to make a nice(r) >> schema. >> > > >> > > Sanjiva. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
