Yes, I agree +1.. This would help in writing test cases for both
serialization as well as deserialization
asankha
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Yes
+1
Paul
On 11/8/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Its quite easy right now to forget to implement the MediatorSerializer
interface when you're implementing a new mediator. You have to
implement the
MediatorFactory interface as thats the only way to get the Mediator
picked
up by the runtime but nothing tells you that you should also implement
MediatorSerializer. Is it the intention that every mediator should
have an
associated MediatorSerializer? If so how about moving the
MediatorSerializer
methods to the MediatorFactory interface so you have to implement them?
...ant
On 11/7/06, indika kumara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I figure out that in current synapse distribution, There are no
Test Cases
for both Mediator Factories and MediatorSerializerers.I thinks It is
better
to have some Test Cases to assure functionality of those. I hope to
working
on creating Junit Test Cases for both Mediator Factories and
MediatorSerializerers.I expect to follow ,following steps in
developing Test
Cases.
>
>
>
>
> 1 Build a OMElement form a XML Stream – Input OM
>
> 2 Build a Mediator form that Input OM using Factory
>
> 3 Serialize a Mediator and get OM - Output OM
>
> 4 Compare Input OM and Output OM
>
>
> Please give your comments on this...
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Best Regards
>
> Indika
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
