+1 for the idea of making the Synapse Configuration easier. But how to deal with the in and out mediators? Would they be only allowed for the "main" sequence?
Tijs > > van: "Asankha C. Perera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > datum: 2006/12/18 Mon PM 12:39:29 MET > aan: [email protected] > onderwerp: Thinking out loud on the possibility to replace the main mediator > with a sequence named 'main' > > Currently a Synapse configuration forces a 'main' mediator specified > with the <rules> tags as follows: > > <synapse> > registrydef > <definitions> > (sequencedef | endpointdef | literalpropertydef)+ > <definitions>? > <proxies> > proxyservice+ > </proxies>? > <rules [key="string"]> > mediator* > </rules> > </synapse> > > I am thinking that if we make the main mediator (sometimes referred to > as the Synapse rules) a sequence with a well known name (e.g. main) it > might make things simpler...i.e a Synapse configuration would then > contain an optional registry definition, followed by sequence, endpoint > and property definitions and proxy services. > > thoughts? > > asankha > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
