Actually you can use a class without a namespace because it will try that first.
I will doc the whole thing properly when I get back to proper Internet access. Paul On 8/18/07, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Fremantle wrote: > > > > To make life a teensy bit easier, you don't need to specify the full > > class name for any job in that package. If there is no package set > > then I concatenate that package, so specifying class="MessageInjector" > > is the same as specifying > > "org.apache.synapse.startup.jobs.MessageInjector > > -1 for this bit .. it means you can't use a class without a namespace! I > don't see value in this "extra, extra sugar"! > > Has the language spec been updated with the new extension? I'd like to > think about the whole thing but need to see the big picture first! > > Thanks, > > Sanjiva. > -- > Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. > Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/ > Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/ > Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ > Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
