On Nov 20, 2007 11:44 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>
- the action could really be optional as its not so hard for the runtime to > > see that the value has been changed and set/getandset would just be a > > performance optimisation > > I guess so. It depends on whether we generate the property and > getters/setters or not. I was kind of assuming that we wouldn't generate > them. Alternatively we could cache values before and after the execute > method, but thats a bit yucky, I think its so simple to use an annotation, > and also since you get command completion for annotations inside IDEs we can > make it a required property. > > What do you mean by "generate the property and getters/setters"? ...ant
