[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12555489#action_12555489
 ] 

Ruwan Linton commented on SYNAPSE-191:
--------------------------------------

I tried this sometime back in December and it worked. Is it possible to send 
the xslt that you are using to transform the message so that I can have a look 
again. It seems like the xslt transformer has an issue with the xsi namespace.

Further when I debug this I saw that the element fed to the xslt processor 
contains the xsi namespace declaration.

> XLST Mediator Issue when using xsi namespace in the Body of Message
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SYNAPSE-191
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-191
>             Project: Synapse
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 1.1
>         Environment: wso2esb-1.6-qa-b1, Java 1.5.0, Windows XP SP2
>            Reporter: Matt Shaw
>            Assignee: Ruwan Linton
>             Fix For: 1.1.1
>
>         Attachments: WebServiceResponse.xml
>
>
> When using the XSLT mediator to transform the result of a proxied web 
> service.  If the proxied web service returns elements that use the xsi 
> namespace within the Body, the XSLT transform fails.  I believe this is 
> because the xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; definition 
> is normally contained within the Envelope element but when the XSLT meditor 
> is invoked only the contents of the Body element are passed to the XSLT 
> mediator.  Therefore the new XML fragment is not atomic and complete because 
> the xsi defintion is lost.
> Thanks
> Matt

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to