Yes, that statement is wrong. each endpoint can have ANY soap stack that implements the WS-* specifications needed.
On 2/1/06, LiChung Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi I'm new to the list, and have question about the difference between > ServiceMix > and Synapse, please let me know if I'm asking the qustion on the wrong list. > > I know this question probably has already been asked, but my question is > regarding > this: > > http://servicemix.org/How+does+ServiceMix+compare+to+Synapse > > More specifically, the paragraphs: > > "...Building an SOA on Apache Synapse would presume that all exchanges > in the SOA would be Web Service exchanges based on SOAP, that the > management of the exchanges would be invoked exclusively by means of > WS-*, and that the underlying SOAP technology at each brokered endpoint > would be Apache Axis2. > > ServiceMix is a full ESB that can work with many different SOAP Stacks such > as > Axis, WSIF, XFire, ActiveSOAP and JAX-WS...." > > I'm abit confused by the statement "at each brokered endpoint would be > Apache Axis2". > First, is this statement correct? If it is, why would this be the case? If > Synapse acts > as a broker that relies on the WS-* in the SOAP header, then shouldn't any > other > technology (like .NET) that has the same ability be able to send/receive > messages > with Synapse? > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
