> * one-document-per-field. Modifications are super-efficient (only one > field is touched), and there are basically no conflicts. But overall > data size grows significantly (we pay overhead on every field). And > encrypting each field separately reveals a lot more information (and > is a lot more malleable), weakening our security claims.
Worth mentioning that this is vulnerable to the "five lawnchairs" problem: it's equivalent to having a server do per-field automatic merging. The more fine-grained the records, the more we introduce cross-record constraints. _______________________________________________ Sync-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
