On Aug 12, 2013, at 3:09 AM, Ryan Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/08/2013 12:57 AM, Lloyd Hilaiel wrote: >> On Aug 9, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Nick Alexander <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 13-08-09 5:35 AM, Lloyd Hilaiel wrote: >>>> 4. (chris karlof) Future Storage Implementation - This is defining the >>>> simplest storage protocol that can work reasonably across our initial >>>> data types, bound by the MVP definition. >>> >>> 5. (ryan kelly) Storage Server implementation? Kind of a big deal. >> >> +1 > > +1 :-) > > However, I think we should leave "Storage" as a single project blob for > now, driven by client dev concerns. I will continue to veto anything > that looks too awful from a server-side perspective. > > Once we get past this initial flurry of exploration and decision-making, > then we can split it into "Storage Client" and "Storage Server" and > drive them forward in parallel.
this makes sense, I like it, let's do it. lloyd > We're close on that front, but I don't think we're there yet. > > > Cheers, > > Ryan > _______________________________________________ > Sync-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev _______________________________________________ Sync-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
