On Aug 13, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Andreas Gal <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You seem to be implying that I am uncomfortable with projects using different > tools. That is as unfair as it is inaccurate. I heavily use github, github > issues and a whole range of tools that are not bugzilla and hg. Every project > we do in research is on github. Every project I start that is not meant to be > a Mozilla product you can find on my github. I simply learned the hard way > that for Mozilla products you have to stick to the Mozilla process (we had to > migrate FFOS off Github issues and into bugzilla, that really sucked), and I > am trying to help you avoid making mistakes I made before. Don't shoot the > messenger who is trying to help you, not on this list, and not on any other > list. I'm sorry if you took my response as offensive or implying things that are unfair or inaccurate, Andreas. All I'm saying is I think we can agree that we use bugzilla for sync work and move on. And I really am excited that you're so involved on the list, even when it's challenging. All I was trying to say is, from where I sit, "Mozilla products have to stick to the Mozilla process" is divergent from reality. rust, Persona, and pdf.js are a couple examples of mozilla projects that use github issues. Typing another word about them is not needed. And I'm saying if we're overly broad with our edicts here, it alienates folks working hard on those projects - and adds noise to this list. For sync, we use bugzilla. And we move on. ok? lloyd > Andreas >> Let's not make the issue broader than is necessary for this list - if you're >> uncomfortable with projects that use different tools, there are better >> forums for discussing that. >> >> lloyd >> _______________________________________________ Sync-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
