Thanks for the background, Zach. This makes total sense. lloyd
On Nov 8, 2013, at 12:43 AM, Zachary Carter <[email protected]> wrote: > I touched on it briefly in my other reply, but, simply, the generated bundle > is bloated, ugly, and of questionable stability. The work required to get it > into a state that could potentially pass gaia review was deemed not worth it, > especially with the raw_password endpoints and parts of the client already > being written in gecko. We're in the process of rewriting gherkin for the web > first instead of node.js for similar reasons. > > -z > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Lloyd Hilaiel" <[email protected]> >> To: "Austin King" <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], "Zachary Carter" >> <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 1:04:49 AM >> Subject: Re: 10.21.13 Engineering Progress Report for Firefox Accounts and >> Sync.next >> >> On Oct 24, 2013, at 8:00 PM, Austin King <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 10/24/13 8:17 AM, Zachary Carter wrote: >>>> For FxAccounts on FxOS, we've determined that landing the browserified >>>> FxAccounts client library in gaia is not really viable. >>> Why isn't it viable? These kinds of details are helpful for evaluating >>> Desktop strategies. >> >> I too am curious to hear the backstory! >> >> lloyd >> >>> >>> thanks, >>> ozten >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dev-fxacct mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxacct >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev-fxacct mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxacct >> _______________________________________________ Sync-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
