On 24/1/17 03:18, Richard Newman wrote:
> The original goal I was pushing for, many years ago, was for the FxA
> device list to be canonical: it shouldn't be as vulnerable to bugs,
> duplicates, TTLs, and stale records as anything a particular
> identity-attached service stores.

I strongly agree, we should try to move towards using the FxA device
list as the canonical version.  Frankly I'd like to see the sync
"clients" collection disappear entirely, but that's probably a long ways
away.

> The first steps to that were to put the FxA client ID into client
> records (e.g., Bug 1254640, Bug 1250782), but there's a lot of work
> still to do, and I'm not aware of any bugs on file that track it. 

TBH I'm not sure what the next steps are to move this forward.  Could we
e.g. gather some telemetry from clients on how frequently there are
discrepancies between the two lists?


> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 7:59 AM -0800, "Ryan Feeley"
>     While the Sync client teams are working on unifying their device lists 
> [1], it appears as though there is another list that is not being taken into 
> account–the device list on the web [2].
>     Users should only see their one list of active Firefox devices no matter 
> the context.
>     I appreciate that this might be a cross team effort, making it a tricky 
> bug for me to file, but is there any way to make this happen?

Let's drill down into this a little.  Are you seeing a discrepency
between the FxA device list and the send-tab device list on your current
setup?  If so then that's a great place to start, let's file it as a bug
in bugzilla for further discussion.


  Cheers,

    Ryan
_______________________________________________
Sync-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev

Reply via email to