I said Philipp but I meant Carlos, as it should be clear... Sorry for the typo.
2011/8/31 João Almeida <[email protected]> > I have to agree with Philipp here, AES adoption has never convinced me > properly. > > Kinda like what is happening in GSM networks, quite convenient IMHO... > Unless it really hurts performance, Syncany should have solid security > features (one of the key points of Syncany is that you can host it on your > own server, hence secure your data, so it should be done in the best way > possible - consider the possibilities for enterprises). > > Best regards! > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Michael Ekstrand <[email protected]>wrote: > >> What's wrong with AES? Properly used (CBC or CTR, good keying, etc.), >> it's pretty standard for secure deployments and is a FIPS standard. >> >> -- >> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Syncany >> Team, which is subscribed to Syncany. >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825986 >> >> Title: >> Use a safer encyption algorithm >> >> Status in Syncany: >> Confirmed >> >> Bug description: >> Actually, the algorithms used by Syncany are too unsafe (only AES and >> 3DES). It's a huge security bug IMHO. >> >> Syncany should be able to use safer encyption algorithms like PGP >> (GPG) or AES+Twofish+Serpent. >> >> To manage notifications about this bug go to: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/sy >> nncany/+bug/825986/+subscriptions<https://bugs.launchpad.net/syncany/+bug/825986/+subscriptions> >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~syncany-team >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~syncany-team >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~syncany-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~syncany-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
