> Aha, ok that applies easier and compiles cleanly, but I get errors with
> the new synce-registry tool.
What kind of errors?
>
> Top of my head, I'm on WM2003, which if I understand rapi correctly uses
> the version 1 calls. Would your changes have affected these badly ?
You are correct, from wm5 on automatically the rapi2 ops are used.
I looked into the code, but rapi_buffer_read_string is not used in rapi, only
in rapi2.
The only thing that I can think of is that handling certain NULL parameters,
for values you are not interested in goes wrong.
Does anybody know whether what is actually sent over the wire differs a lot
between rapi and rapi2?
If you could provide me some info of what exactly goes wrong I might be able
to figure out what is causing the errors in your case. (Problem is that I
don't have WM2003 device, only WM6....)
Guido Diepen
--
Aviation is proof that given the will, we have the
capacity to achieve the impossible.
--Eddie Rickenbacker
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
SynCE-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
