On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 23:16 +0200, Mark Ellis wrote: > On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 23:00 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 21:45 +0100, Mark Ellis wrote: > > > > > Ok, whoa :) > > > > > > I was all ready to start a 'kernel status' thread, and the train went > > > without me. Don't get me wrong, this is good, but is there anything else > > > we want to submit to the kernel guys ? Considering how long it took to > > > get to the stage we're at, it's worth thinking it through first. > > > > > > I intended to have a good look through usb-rndis-lite and compare it to > > > the latest kernel before we had this discussion, but hey. > > > > > > To my knowledge, and the quick browse I had, we don't have anything in > > > usbnet and cdc_ether that needs to be submitted. > > > > > > In rndis_host, obviously there is the subject of this thread, but has > > > the Samsung timeout patch been submitted? Anyone know of anything else ? > > > > Doing it one thing at a time seems sane anyway. Submitting a big clump > > of stuff would likely result in some of it getting held up by debates > > about the other stuff. Tethering is a small, pretty safe (should be :>) > > patch which has been tested to work, so I think it's OK to submit it on > > its own. > > > > The other big thing that I know of is John's infamous 'dirty patch' that > > fixes -110 errors on certain devices (including several owned by MDV > > users). He wants to clean this up before submitting it upstream. He says > > he'll probably get time to work on this next week. That isn't even in > > usb-rndis-lite SVN head, though - it's still a separate patch. > > -- > > Agreed that submitting a big patch of unrelated items is bad. > > I just think it may be a little simpler if we know that, at point A, we > had submitted everything we had, as patches 1,2, and 3. As I said, I > really don't know what has been submitted, what needs to be submitted. > If someone does, cool ! > > Mark >
Actually, it would be cool if anything that went to lkml was just cc'd to synce-devel ? What is John's dirty patch ? Does it cover the Samsung timeout thing ? Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
