On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:16 +0100, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:58 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Since this file is specific for syncevolution, you may want to modify > the mapping in it and see if it solves your problem. > > > I think the mapping for X-EVOLUTION-COMPANY should be removed. I don't > > remember whether we discussed this in the past and a mail search didn't > > bring it up. > > It's a synclet specific for Evolution: you're more expert than us to > modify the mapping. Feel free to play around and send the updated bsh to > Funambol for testing.
Yongsheng, is this something you can have a look at? You would have to install the Funambol server locally. > > Can you ask the myFUNAMBOL developers/admins about this? Filing bug > > reports or mailing the lists often doesn't get prompt (or any) reply. > > For example, the "lost ACTION" email hasn't drawn any response. We've > > got a workaround though, so that isn't relevant anymore, except perhaps > > for other clients. > > I apologize for not receiving a response. For the future, if you guys > have important issues that you feel should be taken into consideration > please cc me. Also, don't forget to post to [email protected], too: > that list has less traffic and gets more attention. But aren't we as users of Funambol supposed to stay of that list so that the traffic remains low and the core developers can use it for their internal discussions? ;-) Or has the definition of the lists changed without me noticing it? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
