On Monday 24 August 2009 16:08:26 Patrick Ohly wrote: > But I'd like to go one step further: instead of switching to > libsynthesis, I suggest that you consider integrating your work with > SyncEvolution. libsynthesis is really just the raw engine. The app > framework that you know from libfunambol is provided by SyncEvolution > for libsynthesis. The "syncevolution" command line tool should work with > a KDE backend right away. > > We are currently in the process of revising the D-Bus API for GUIs. The > sync engine is already decoupled from the GTK GUI via D-Bus, but this > was done in a rather ad-hoc fashion and we think this can be improved. > It would be great to get your feedback, but as you are going on vacation > (lucky you!), we'll have to give it a shot and then revise it when you > come back end of September - assuming that you are interested, of > course.
Out of interest, what are the dependencies for libsynthesis and syncevolution? -- Cheers, Mike Arthur http://mikearthur.co.uk/ _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
