On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 03:06 +0100, Chen, Congwu wrote: > >>Please make it so that with --enable-evolution-compatibility, dlopen() > >>is used to check for the new functions with an if(!= NULL) check in the > >>code itself which determines whether the functions can be called. This > >>is important for the binaries published via syncevolution.org, because a > >>single binary is meant to work with multiple Evolution releases. > >> > >Sure, I will take care of this. I think the syncsource api need to be > >adapted a > >little to accommodate the new backend api. Since there is a code refactoring > >around this in backend-api branch. I want to postpone a little and work on > >the new api later when the backend-api got merged into master. > I have pushed this to eds branch. Please help review.
I will, but please give me some time. In related news, Ross was volunteered to review the patches for EDS itself. > BTW: I also changed retry,resend,suspend tests to be off by default, in > nightly branch. Merged. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
