On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 07:09 +0100, Zhu, Yongsheng wrote: > A nice and smart framework to use libgdbus for C++. I am fascinated by the > design in gdbus-cxx-bridge.h. > I see many classes or methods definition like 'xxx0', 'xxx1', 'xxx2', etc. It > would be helpful if a tool could be > used to generate them like dbus-binding-tool in glib.
It would have saved me about half a day of cut-and-paste. Writing a script might have taken longer, so I went for the low-tech approach. Not running any kind of tool during the build process was part of the design goals, so the script would only be used to update the bridge header in the repo. > I find 'org.syncevolution.server' interface is defined in > 'syncevo-ng-full.xml'. > But 'syncevo-server-full.xml' also defines this interface but with some other > methods. > What is the purpose to split it into 2 places? I haven't merged yet because I ran out of time yesterday evening ;-) Will do so now. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
