On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 21:00 +0000, Patrick Ohly wrote: > There are some known issues, see below. The more issues get reported > and fixed, the sooner there will be a 0.9.2 maintenance update, so keep > the reports coming.
I wondered whether I should delay 0.9.1, but then decided against it because a) it is already included in Moblin 2.1, b) the issues seem to have limited impact and are no regressions compared to 0.9 and c) we can always do an update. > In the current "master" branch, SyncEvolution itself is already able > to act as a SyncML server. Support for direct synchronization via > Bluetooth is planned for 1.0. A snapshot release will be made available > as soon as possible - end of October obviously did not work out... Having the server working revealed quite a bit of additional work items. The rewritten D-Bus server seems to be in good shape, but it is uncertain what the state of the corresponding sync-UI is. > Patrick Ohly, on behalf of everyone who has helped > to make SyncEvolution 0.9.x possible: > http://syncevolution.org/about/contributors Let me repeat that once more: SyncEvolution wouldn't exist in its current form without quite a few people contributing to it. Keep up the good work, guys and gals! -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
