On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 05:43 +0000, Zhu, Yongsheng wrote: > Hi, > > Now my question is: should the CPPUnit-based tests be replaced by > > Python/D-Bus ones? The advantage is that we only have to maintain the > > tests once, possibly in some easier form. The disadvantage is that > > without D-Bus enabled, that test doesn't work, and that we haven't > > integrated the D-Bus tests into our nightly testing. > Yes. Another thing is that I think moving current test cases from > CPPUnit-based > also need much work to do. But I'm inclined to move. Because this could also > make > us maintenance and write new cases easier. > > Do ' CPPUnit-based tests' include interoperability tests with servers?
Yes. The whole client-test program is based on CPPUnit. Rewriting all of that in Python would be quite a bit of work, so I'd prefer to only drop a test in the CPPUnit part if some replacement/improvement has to be written in Python anyway. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
