Il giorno mer, 10/02/2010 alle 08.54 -0400, David Bremner ha scritto: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:22:41 +0100, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > So 1.0 won't make it. Is there a chance to get a 0.9.2 compiled properly > > (libical used by libsynthesis) into Lucid? Does that depend on David > > updating something or can the Ubuntu team do the update themselves? > > Unfortunately I'm not sure who, if anyone, is doing the port to > Ubuntu. It may just be a script.
It generally is, but since we are late I can take care of the "pressing" which should get 0.9.2 in anyway (since it does more bugfixing than adding new features, I think it will be almost straighforward). > The current libsynthesis packages in Debian experimental might be > worthwhile for Ubuntu, since they are compiled against libical. If a > few people would test them against syncevolution 0.9.1 or 0.9.2, I could > arrange to have them uploaded to unstable. That would make it plausible > to package 0.9.2, since packaging two versions of libsynthesis is a bit > of a pain, and my goal for Debian at this point is 1.0 betaX. > I will try. (Any quick pointer on what is the fastest way? So far, I only tested syncevolution with scheduleworld but my free account expired, and setting up a funambol server slightly scares me out.) Pietro _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
