On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 12:45 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > - itime = icaltime_from_timet (now, 0); > > + itime = icaltime_from_timet_with_zone (now, 0, > > NULL); > > Upstream replaced icaltime_from_timed(x, 0) > with > icaltime_from_timet_with_zone(x, 0, icaltimezone_get_utc_timezone()). > Is that perhaps also what should be done in SyncEvolution?
No, internally icaltime_from_timed(x, 0) was implemented as icaltime_from_timet_with_zone(x, 0, NULL), just like your patch does, s that should be fine. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
