Le 4/25/12 5:22 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
Even if fixing current release lacks would be easy, I'd suggest you
anyway to roll an RC2 to have a better release process.
Here, I would disagree : if you don't provide a RC1 to download,
people will wonder where the hell is RC1...
IMHO, when the release is not voted, or withdrawn, then we should keep
the same number for the next attempt.
If you don't have objections, I will:

1. wait for 72 hours to pass (tomorrow, 18;24 CET), then send a summary
e-mail with all votes and the reason why this RC1 release attempt did
not succeed
2. remove SVN tag, delete staging repository
3. draft a release page on our website (inspired from links provided by
Emmanuel)
4. close SYNCOPE-66 (still to verify if source archives gets MD5 / SHA1
/ ASC)
5. start again the release process for RC1

WDYT?
Then don't wait 72 hours if you are going to doom RC1 :) Just do it right away !


--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Reply via email to