Hi all (and specifically, mentors),
I'd like to understand if our LICENSE and NOTICE files are fine or not.
Sebb, in the e-mail below from general@incubator ML puts some
objections: it is not clear to me if such objections are matter of (his)
taste of whether instead can block next release vote.
Can you help?
Thanks.
Regards.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-RC1-incubating
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 10:05:41 +0100
From: sebb <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread, remove Nexus staging
repo and SVN tag, fix everything and start again the release process for
1.0.0-RC1-incubating from scratch.
Regards.
On 07/05/2012 14:47, sebb wrote:
On 7 May 2012 10:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò<[email protected]> wrote:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r1333797):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/syncope/tags/syncope-1.0.0-RC1-incubating/
There must be an Incubator DISCLAIMER.
This is required in all distributions (and on the web-site, which has been
done).
Please add the DISCLAIMER file to SVN and make sure it gets added to all
archives.
Understood.
The NOTICE file is very long; I suspect that not all of the entries are
*required*.
The LICENSE and NOTICE files were written against the parent POM: all the
dependencies with scope != test were considered, then.
The N&L files must relate to what is actually included in the archive.
For example, cglib is available under AL 2.0, so I don't think it needs to
be mentioned in the NOTICE file.
All the AL 2.0 dependencies not from ASF were added anyway to the LICENSE
and NOTICE files; we preferred to have these two files with the same
entries, even though for different purposes.
The NOTICE file has a specific purpose; it should *only* contain
required notices.
The LICENSE file should mention all software included in the release.
In both cases, the N&L files should only mention software that is actually
included in the release.
The LICENSE file misspells Javassist.
Already fixed in trunk: thanks for reporting!
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesyncope-034/
The syncope-root POM does not use the Apache POM as parent.
ASF product Poms should normally chain back to a version of the Apache
pom to ensure that the correct settings are established.
[the other poms do chain back to the Apache pom]
If there is a good reason for not doing so, it should be documented in
the pom, and care must be taken to ensure that the required elements
are copied from the Apache pom.
As you might have noticed, the root POM is not the parent POM, and parent
POM does extend Apache POM 10.
The root POM is only functional to perform some actions: anyway we'll try to
make it extend Apache POM as well.
FYI, we have already planned to "normalize" POM structure in next major
release (see SYNCOPE-79 on JIRA)
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesyncope-034/org/apache/syncope/syncope-root/1.0.0-RC1-incubating/syncope-root-1.0.0-RC1-incubating-source.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesyncope-034/org/apache/syncope/syncope-root/1.0.0-RC1-incubating/syncope-root-1.0.0-RC1-incubating-source.zip
PGP release keys (signed using 273DF287):
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/syncope/KEYS
This has been voted through on the [email protected]
mailing list [1],
and now requires a vote on [email protected]
Votes already cast (on syncope-dev):
+1 (binding)
* Francesco Chicchiriccò
* Fabio Martelli
* Marco Di Sabatino Di Diodoro
* Massimiliano Perrone
* Colm O hEigeartaigh (IPMC member)
* Emmanuel Lécharny (IPMC member)
* Simone Tripodi
+1 (non binding)
* Denis SIgnoretto
* Riccardo Costa
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Best regards.
[1]
http://syncope-dev.1063484.n5.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Apache-Syncope-1-0-0-RC1-incubating-4th-attempt-tt5690572.html
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
