Thanks on all counts. Regards, KAM
On January 23, 2018 11:27:51 AM EST, Dave Jones <da...@apache.org> wrote: >FYI. I have fulfilled this request and will watch the submissions from > >secuserve the next couple of days to make sure their classification an >rule hits look Ok. > >Dave > >On 01/23/2018 09:45 AM, Dave Jones wrote: >> Wow, that is badly outdated now. The new information on the >> InfraNotes2017 page supersedes that so I will update that information >on >> the RsyncConfig page shortly. I didn't know that page existed until >now >> or I would have updated it already. >> >> Does anyone have any objections to me setting up this new masscheck >> rsync account? I ran across this the other day which got me thinking > >> about this issue of trust and how it could be solved: >> >> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6694 >> >> Currently I have setup some basic monitoring scripts to make sure we >> have enough masscheck contributors and ham/spam corpora. I think if >> someone went rogue on us we would know it pretty quickly so I am not >too >> concerned about trust until I see someone abuse it. >> >> Dave >> >> On 01/23/2018 08:31 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >>> Hi Sidney, I'd defer it to Dave. He really spearheaded all the >recent >>> work and would likely know it off-hand since it's on new servers, >etc. >>> >>> On 1/23/2018 9:26 AM, Sidney Markowitz wrote: >>>> Hi Kevin, >>>> >>>> This brings up an issue - The instructions on how to handle a >request >>>> like >>>> this seem out of date. It might be as simple as the secrets file >>>> being in a >>>> different directory, but I can only guess at that. Can you correct >it? >>>> >>>> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RsyncConfig >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Sidney >>> >>> >>
