Hi Darren, [posting as a contributor]
I don't know GSSAPI or SASL well enough to evaluate their approriateness for securing syslog. Are you willing to write one or two drafts proposing these as possible solutions so the WG can evaluate them as alternatives? [posting as a contributor] David Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 6:14 AM > To: Miao Fuyou > Cc: 'David Harrington'; 'Rainer Gerhards'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Syslog] Secure transport alternatives > > Miao Fuyou wrote: > > real "general" security mechanisms(except IPsec, but it is not > > application-friendly). So, IMHO the primary criteria for > selection is: is it > > convenient for the application to invoke the security > service provided by > > the security protocol? > > That to me sounds like GSSAPI or SASL. > > Any reason these aren't being considered ? > > -- > Darren J Moffat > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
