Chris I agreed (mostly) with the actions in your e-mail but do not see them all reflected in -05. See <inline>
Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Miao Fuyou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 11:05 PM Subject: Re: [Syslog] Towards closure of syslog-tls issues > > > 3, Ciphersuite. Tom proposed to specify cipher suite in the transport > > document, but I still don't find necessity to do so. I tend to agree to > > Rainer's proposal: > > http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg01305.html > > In addition to that > - reference the latest TLS RFC and note that there are updates to that > which need to be considered This I see, at least the latest RFC part > - note that the latest ciphers and their relative strengths may be > found in BCP86 This I do not see and would like to > - note that implementors and deployers should keep aware of current > literature Likewise, this I do not see and would like to > (This should be about 3 sentences.) > <snip> > > Please make these changes and submit -05 so we can submit this to the > IESG. > > Thanks, > Chris > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
