>  > I agree with your idea, however. Although the possibility of getting a
>>  graphics quick browser is nil to none, I'd like something quicker for my
>>  Plus, my SE/30, PB100 and my hot-rodded SE FDHD.
>
>You can get pretty far with software written in very neat and efficient
>68000 assembly code. Problem: there are very few people who are that
>good at programming... They are now among the most expensive and time
>pressed software architects around.
>Luckily, especially those top of the bill programmers have a weakness
>for system 6, because it is one of the all time masterpieces in their
>field.
>
>Translated into the music business: it is like asking the late Heifetz
>to play for free, but you might have a chance because you are asking him
>to play Bach.
>
>Marten
>

I am not talking about a whiz-bang version of Opera or iCab for 6 - I 
am talking about a simple, stable and fast BASIC browser - no 
javascript, tables, frames, or forms - just display the darn pictures 
within the same window as the text.  And to do so without crashing 
when you add to the hotlist or change the prefs would be pretty neat 
as well.

The really old versions of IE and Netscape are not bad on an SE/30 - 
IF YOU USE SYSTEM 7 (which really slows down that poor, old compact 
Mac).  And a NEW text-only 6-Browser similar to the beautiful WannaBe 
by David Pierson would REALLY make life with System 6 much more 
useful and speedy.  But, again, to use WannaBe you have to have 
System 7.

So, going out on a particularly thin limb here, this is what I 
propose.  We need to organize and write grants to hire developers. 
In the past, has this community EVER tried to organize to write 
grants for software development under System 6?  I think that some 
time-strapped developer would at least TRY to do it if we bothered to 
form a REAL community and coughed up some REAL cash for his or her 
time.

All you need to do to get grant money for a project like this is to 
present your case in the right light to the right foundation.  The 
blurb at the top of Marten's site would be an excellent place to 
start.  It states good reasons to attempt these ideas; these ideas 
are worth money to some foundations out there.  And this is a 
money-driven field.

There is a ton of money held by privately funded foundations out 
there.  And they make grants for all sorts of obscure stuff if the 
idea is presented to them in the correct manner.  This is how 
composers and authors get by in many cases.  I guess that it is 
rather obscure to lay persons.  But it is a very legitimate route to 
travel if one is willing to do some work.

If we formed a real group, we could get money granted to developers 
to write privately for us.  When the group commissions a piece of 
software, we could stipulate exactly what we want:  a patch for the 
"xxx" init in 6 to update its functionality, a new cdev for 6 that 
will duplicate the functionality of "xxx" from 7, or a better text 
browser with a feature set to be determined by us.

We don't have to be so hopeless about this situation.  But it would 
take a group of people that really want to make 6 better and are 
willing to spend a lot of time in order to do it.  You have to be a 
bit pushy and have a fistful of cash to get things done.  But things 
can be done, nonetheless.

People who ONLY use 6 because it is obscure and old (believing that 
that somehow makes them superior) probably shouldn't be in this 
group, because any real attempt to reactivate software development in 
the 6 environment would be tantamount to sacrilege to them.  I have 
leanings in that direction myself, at times.  I feel that 6 should 
just be left alone - that it is good enough as it is.  Then I look at 
OS X and wish that I was part of a movement to revitalize System 6. 
I really would like to make it my main OS.

My reasons?  They involve both software and hardware issues.  I 
dislike the direction the GUI is going.  I am tired of ever-growing, 
RAM-hogging bloatware.  I am tired of MicroSoft products.  I am tired 
of Apple's current trend towards hardware "planned obsolescence" 
dictating when my fairly new Mac will die so that I will be forced 
into yet another multi-thousand dollar purchase.  I want to sell my 
broken Lombard to someone who does not care that the case is flimsy, 
the screen hinge is floppy and the trackpad no longer works.

Therefore, if Apple made my SE/30 bulletproof AND made a fast and 
stable OS for it that is free, then I want to "go retro" and use them 
as my main computing platform!  EVEN FOR BROWSING, IF AT ALL 
POSSIBLE!   Give me my SE/30 and let it fly with 6!

(Man, do I come off as some sort of rebel in this or WHAT?  All I 
really want is a better text browser or a browser that displays 
images in the parent window.  Really.  I'm not a raving fanatic . . . 
but I could become one if others were willing to join me.  It can not 
be done by one person.)

Wade Rackley



-- 
System6 is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

123Inkjets.com <http://lowendmac.com/ad/123inkjets.html>

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

  System 6 Heaven <http://www.euronet.nl/users/mvdk/system_6_heaven.html>

System6 info:           <http://lowendmac.com/lists/system6.html>
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/system6%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to